Friday 24 September 2010 01:23:10 Tony Lindgren napisał(a):
- Janusz Krzysztofik jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl [100910 18:26]:
This patch adds support for SoC camera interface to OMAP1 devices.
Created and tested against linux-2.6.36-rc3 on Amstrad Delta.
For successfull compilation, requires a header file provided by PATCH 1/6 from this series, "SoC Camera: add driver for OMAP1 camera interface".
<snip>
diff -upr linux-2.6.36-rc3.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/camera.h linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/camera.h
linux-2.6.36-rc3.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/camera.h 2010-09-0 3 22:34:03.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/camera.h 2010-09-09 18:42:30.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_ +#define __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_
+#include <media/omap1_camera.h>
+extern void omap1_set_camera_info(struct omap1_cam_platform_data *);
+#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_CAMERA_H_ */
Care to refresh this patch so it does not include media/omap1_camera.h?
That way things keep building if I merge this one along with the omap patches and the drivers/media patches can get merged their via media.
I think you can just move the OMAP1_CAMERA_IOSIZE to the devices.c or someplace like that?
Tony, Not exactly. I use the OMAP1_CAMERA_IOSIZE inside the driver when reserving space for register cache.
I think that I could just duplicate its definition in the devices.c for now, than clean things up with a folloup patch when both parts already get merged. Would this be acceptable?
Thanks, Janusz
Regards,
Tony
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html