On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
Hi Marin, Since I've finaly managed to make use of your method without any previously observerd limitations (see below), I'm interested in it being implemented system-wide. Are you going to submit a patch?
I'm about to submit a patch, which you'll be most welcome to test. Just give me a couple more hours.
I would suggest creating one common function that allocates and fills the dev->dma_mem structure, and two wrappers that call it: a dma_declare_coherent_memory() replacement, that passes an ioremapped device memory address to the common fuction, and your proposed dma_reserve_coherent_memory(), that passes a pointer returned by the dma_alloc_coherent() instead.
[ 6067.220000] omap1-camera omap1-camera.0: OMAP1 Camera driver attached to camera 0 [ 6067.650000] omap1-camera omap1-camera.0: omap1_cam_try_fmt: format 32315659 not found [ 6067.680000] omap1-camera omap1-camera.0: omap1_cam_try_fmt: format 32315559 not found [ 6068.480000] mplayer: page allocation failure. order:6, mode:0xd0 [ 6068.500000] Backtrace: [ 6068.520000] [<c0028950>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0028ea8>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c) [ 6068.560000] r6:00000006 r5:000000d0 r4:c1bcf000 [ 6068.590000] [<c0028e90>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c0074e24>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x504/0x560) [ 6068.620000] [<c0074920>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x0/0x560) from [<c002ae14>] (__dma_alloc+0x108/0x354) [ 6068.660000] [<c002ad0c>] (__dma_alloc+0x0/0x354) from [<c002b0ec>] (dma_alloc_coherent+0x58/0x64) [ 6068.700000] [<c002b094>] (dma_alloc_coherent+0x0/0x64) from [<bf000a44>] (__videobuf_mmap_mapper+0x10c/0x374 [videobuf_dma_contig]) [ 6068.740000] r7:c16934c0 r6:00000000 r5:c171baec r4:00000000 [ 6068.770000] [<bf000938>] (__videobuf_mmap_mapper+0x0/0x374 [videobuf_dma_contig]) from [<c01f9a78>] (videobuf_mmap_mapper+0xc4/0x108) [ 6068.810000] [<c01f99b4>] (videobuf_mmap_mapper+0x0/0x108) from [<c01fc1ac>] (soc_camera_mmap+0x80/0x140) [ 6068.840000] r5:c1a3b4e0 r4:00000000 [ 6068.870000] [<c01fc12c>] (soc_camera_mmap+0x0/0x140) from [<c01eeba8>] (v4l2_mmap+0x4c/0x5c) [ 6068.900000] r7:c145c000 r6:000000ff r5:c16934c0 r4:00000000 [ 6068.930000] [<c01eeb5c>] (v4l2_mmap+0x0/0x5c) from [<c0085de4>] (mmap_region+0x238/0x458) [ 6068.970000] [<c0085bac>] (mmap_region+0x0/0x458) from [<c00862c0>] (do_mmap_pgoff+0x2bc/0x320) [ 6069.000000] [<c0086004>] (do_mmap_pgoff+0x0/0x320) from [<c00863c0>] (sys_mmap_pgoff+0x9c/0xc8) [ 6069.040000] [<c0086324>] (sys_mmap_pgoff+0x0/0xc8) from [<c0024f00>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c) [ 6069.200000] Mem-info: [ 6069.220000] Normal per-cpu: [ 6069.240000] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 [ 6069.260000] active_anon:676 inactive_anon:682 isolated_anon:0 [ 6069.260000] active_file:422 inactive_file:2348 isolated_file:0 [ 6069.260000] unevictable:177 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 [ 6069.260000] free:1166 slab_reclaimable:0 slab_unreclaimable:0 [ 6069.260000] mapped:1120 shmem:0 pagetables:121 bounce:0 [ 6069.350000] Normal free:4664kB min:720kB low:900kB high:1080kB active_anon:2704kB inactive_anon:2728kB active_file:1688kB inactive_file:9392kB unevictable:708kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:32512kB mlocked:0kB
dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:4480kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:0kB kernel_stack:552kB pagetables:484kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[ 6069.460000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 [ 6069.470000] Normal: 6*4kB 20*8kB 14*16kB 29*32kB 26*64kB 9*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 4664kB [ 6069.530000] 2960 total pagecache pages [ 6069.550000] 8192 pages of RAM [ 6069.560000] 1322 free pages [ 6069.580000] 1114 reserved pages [ 6069.590000] 750 slab pages [ 6069.610000] 2476 pages shared [ 6069.630000] 0 pages swap cached [ 6069.640000] omap1-camera omap1-camera.0: dma_alloc_coherent size 204800 failed [ 6069.680000] omap1-camera omap1-camera.0: OMAP1 Camera driver detached from camera 0
Maybe I should preallocate a few more pages than will be actually used by the driver?
That was it. I was trying to reserve exact frame size, times number of buffers. Apparently, the frame size should be rounded up to the nearest power of 2 first for it to work as expected.
No, I don't think you should go to the next power of 2 - that's too crude. Try rounding your buffer size to the page size, that should suffice.
Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/