At 0:34 -0400 2003/09/14, <Martin(a)Cleaver.org> wrote:
>Hi Kake,
>More questions has anyone proposed, and what's
>the general feeling about, merging the efforts
>of CGI::Wiki and Kwiki? I question the need for
>independent efforts and wonder whether a joint
>community would have better economies of scale.
>Cheers,
> Martin
Apart form Jonathan's point, for me the main
difference is that Kwiki is a bit of CGI that
implements a Wiki. CGI::Wiki isn't, it's a
toolkit that lets you build a wiki. There's an
important difference - to change how Kwiki works,
you're removing bits of it and doing your own
thing. You don't need to change how a CGI::Wiki
engine works, hopefully, it's just a matter of
building the front end differently.
Of course, having said that, I _did_ write
CGI::Wiki::Kwiki, which was intended to be a
simple Kwiki-like front end to CGI::Wiki that
Just Worked, but that was more of a 'move your
kwiki to a 'real' database' aid than anything
else.
There's no way that openguides could have been
built on a Kwiki without serious messing around.
Openguides is obviously a wiki, but not what I'd
think of as a 'traditional' wiki...
--
.tom