main

main@lists.alug.org.uk

10372 discussions

RE: [Alug] New Subscriber Introductions
by Martyn Ashworth 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

> OK out of curriosity as its a sys admin qualification how much did it cost to > get the peace of paper? As I have had some bad luck with job hunting and things > are getting very tight with the moneys It was a one week "intensive" course followed by an exam (which was graciously included for the modest sum of around ?4k). I would look into alternatives as I do honestly believe that it doesn't touch the core of linux but just the RedHat packages/additions that they bundle. Martyn

1 0

Re: [Alug] New Subscriber Introductions
by MJ Ray 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

"Martyn Ashworth" <martyn.ashworth(a)eag.uk.com> writes: > Well, I found that the RHCE examination was not a good test of any persons > abilities with Linux as a whole. I feel that I passed without knowing any > real amount about my beloved OS. Do we have anyone who's either studying for or has passed the LPI <URL:http://www.lpi.org/> exams and can say if *they* are a good qualification?

1 0

RE: [Alug] New Subscriber Introductions
by Martyn Ashworth 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

> I'm being mean here. at least you're honest! >> "an operating system which still baffles me" > [...] >> RedHat Certified Engineer (some would say just remove the word RedHat!) >Hmmmmmmz. Well, I found that the RHCE examination was not a good test of any persons abilities with Linux as a whole. I feel that I passed without knowing any real amount about my beloved OS. I certainly know more through reading HOWTO's and man pages than I ever learned through my time down in Guildford. Still I hope I make up in energy and commitment all that I lose through ignorance and inability. P.S. - Thanks for the welcome MJ. Martyn

2 1

Re: [Alug] Fw: [Eurorights] FC: California appeals court rules against DeCSS defendant (fwd)
by David Freeman 17 Aug '01

17 Aug '01

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:07:35 +0100 "John Woodard" wrote: > David Freeman wrote: > > > Seriously someone who isn't voted in purely on there personality. > > If they are voted in because of their personality how come 95% of all > MPs/MEPs have had a personality bypass? :-) People don't vote for a particular candidate they vote for a party and the personalities of that party, i.e. Hague or Blair? Thanks D > Cheers, > BJ -- "Your house sounds like a fire hazard" Peter Clarke

2 1

Re: [Alug] Fw: [Eurorights] FC: California appeals court rules against DeCSS defendant (fwd)
by David Freeman 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:05:21 +0100 "Ashley T. Howes" wrote: > > > >> This also seems to be related to the general problem of the > >> introduction of > >> more complex technology into society, which is governed by people who > >> don't > >> understand it. Unless something is done, this is only going to > get worse. > > > >The problem is people are apathetic, stupid, gullable and down right > >incompetent. > > Perhaps, or may be they have not been educated about the full implications > of their rulings. I expect they only checked with business on the > advantages/disadvantages of this ruling, and they of course are concerned > 100% with protecting their intellectural copyrights, etc Of course they did why the hell would they consult with general public? The public are a problem, not useful. > >the 3 B's works everytime, add some FUD to the Bull shit and > >your onto a winner, the problem is the goverment is currupt and needs > >replacing, Quite how we can do so will prove difficult, which comes back > >to the qualities of people above. > > I'm curious, who would you like the government to be replaced by? Me! No one understands my needs more than me! Seriously someone who isn't voted in purely on there personality. > > > >But step one is join the Euro crimes mailing list. Step 2 is to join > the EFF. > > > > I'll look into these. Thanks. Good. Thanks D > Ashley > > > > > Dr. Ashley T. Howes PhD www.ashleyhowes.com > Programmer > > "When he sees the dream he seeks, he will sleep" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > alug, the Anglian Linux User Group list > Send list replies to alug(a)stu.uea.ac.uk > http://www.anglian.lug.org.uk/ http://rabbit.stu.uea.ac.uk/cgi-bin/listinfo/alug > See the website for instructions on digest or unsub! -- "Your house sounds like a fire hazard" Peter Clarke

2 1

Re: [Alug] Fw: [Eurorights] FC: California appeals court rules against DeCSS defendant (fwd)
by David Freeman 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:41:16 +0100 "Ashley T. Howes" wrote: > This kind of thing pisses me off, however this is related to the general > defense of laws put in place by the American government. More > exactly, our > problem with this appears to stem from the fact the original law was > passed. The key question appears to be why this law was passed and what > can be done in the future to stop this happening again! We can change it but it will be difficult. We need to make it so that the law is completely useless and we need to work to get it removed! No I am not naive > This also seems to be related to the general problem of the > introduction of > more complex technology into society, which is governed by people who > don't > understand it. Unless something is done, this is only going to get worse. The problem is people are apathetic, stupid, gullable and down right incompetent. the 3 B's works everytime, add some FUD to the Bull shit and your onto a winner, the problem is the goverment is currupt and needs replacing, Quite how we can do so will prove difficult, which comes back to the qualities of people above. > Ideas to stop this in the future, comments on the above? Some Ideas above, but I think we will need to think carefully. Luckily the brits have a good record of being able to change laws through peace full protest i.e. Chartist movement, Suffragets(Sp?), gay rights movement. However non of these really contradicted on the interests of Big business, which could prove interesting, one thing for sure we need to use the system against the system. But step one is join the Euro crimes mailing list. Step 2 is to join the EFF. Thanks D > Ashley > > > > > > Dr. Ashley T. Howes PhD www.ashleyhowes.com > Programmer > > "When he sees the dream he seeks, he will sleep" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > alug, the Anglian Linux User Group list > Send list replies to alug(a)stu.uea.ac.uk > http://www.anglian.lug.org.uk/ http://rabbit.stu.uea.ac.uk/cgi-bin/listinfo/alug > See the website for instructions on digest or unsub! -- "Your house sounds like a fire hazard" Peter Clarke

2 1

Re: [Alug] PostgreSQL v MySQL ??
by MJ Ray 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

"Martyn Ashworth" <martyn.ashworth(a)eag.uk.com> writes: > However, in this particular case it is a single large text file containing > legal information/requirements/building regs/energy conservation regs etc. Look into the "large object" import/export support. Quite how you do this seems to depend on the language...

1 0

RE: [Alug] PostgreSQL v MySQL ??
by Martyn Ashworth 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

Firstly, MJ Ray Wrote: > What the hell are you doing if you expect to do more than 8k in a > single row? If it's a single large object, you should use the > particular support for it (which I admit I'm bad at using). If it's > really unavoidable, you can change that limit to something larger by > recompiling. And Then, Alexis Lee Wrote: > Some People (those who 'picked up database design as they went along'), > like to have all the data in a single table. Lots of fields. It does reduce > joins... <wince> > Incidentally, Martyn, I make the above comment assuming such a design has > been forced upon you, not that you are one of the Some. And In Defense, I Write: I DID pick up Database design as I went along, I first started using Pick/D3 on Linux (back in 96 I think?) which was my first introduction to relational database design. Although I doubt I am even an adequate database designer (having little "real-world" experience) I am not a person who likes large data tables, in fact I have a habit of creating more tables than most people would ever care to count (I believe it's the database equivalent of Sadomasochism?) However, in this particular case it is a single large text file containing legal information/requirements/building regs/energy conservation regs etc. and all those lovely clauses that solicitors love connecting to each particular building we are involved in the construction of. Many can be split down but some are SO big and cumbersome that I decided (with time restrictions imposed - my only real defense against ignorance here) a single table per contract would be the easiest way to go. However, if someone wishes to enlighten the un-enlightened on the best way to handle such volume I would be most appreciative (the IT department here is just 1 person - ME so research time is a precious commodity). I therefore enter a plea of "guilty with extenuating circumstances". Cheers for the advice to all though. Think I will 'play' with PostgreSQL tonight. Good job the coffee machine is free-vend. Martyn

1 0

next meet
by Alexis Lee 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

May I request the next meet be at UEA? I provisionally offer to try installing PHP for people. It's always easier to be there. Did the buffer overflow demo happen? Alexis -- "All programmers are optimists" - Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. Failure- When your best just isn't good enough. "Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that"

1 0

Re: [Alug] PostgreSQL v MySQL ??
by MJ Ray 16 Aug '01

16 Aug '01

"Martyn Ashworth" <martyn.ashworth(a)eag.uk.com> writes: > What advantages are there to migrating across to PostgreSQL now ? A database that works "better", is more "stable and has less "interesting extensions". My opinion only, some people love mySQL and I expect we'll have to wait a few generations for Darwin to work and all the mySQL supporters to have gone insane and not had any surviving offspring. (Hint for the hard of thinking: I'm not being entirely serious here.) > The other problem that i can forsee is that apparantly PostgreSQL has an 8k > row limit which is not un-workable but would require more time and effort > than MySQL for some of my data structures at the present time. What the hell are you doing if you expect to do more than 8k in a single row? If it's a single large object, you should use the particular support for it (which I admit I'm bad at using). If it's really unavoidable, you can change that limit to something larger by recompiling. > I would appreciate any helpful feedback here as the only useful comparison > i've found so far seems to be inconclusive to say the least !! All comparisons but one's own are inconclusive...

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

main