- main - earth.li

Ubuntu Install Fail
by Simon Royal 30 Dec '10

30 Dec '10

Hi My ThinkPad R31 arrived at last, but I am having a problem installing Ubuntu. Im using 9.10 as it is a proper CD not a burnt one. I have a 60GB hd in it. Ive split the drive into 4 partitions. 12GB for XP (which is installed), 12GB waiting for Ubuntu, 1GB swap and 30GB ish for saved files which will be FAT32. XP is installed. Using the Ubuntu Live CD it gets to the partitioner and says 'cant create file system' while trying to create ext3 or ext4 on the Ubuntu partition. Any ideas? Is there any point in using the Alternative CD? I did have problems before using the standard disc and partitioning. Simon

1 0

Free stuff
by David Reynolds 30 Dec '10

30 Dec '10

Hi, Hope you all had a good christmas/holiday break. Whilst having a post-christmas tidy, I have found the following items which may be of interest to fellow aluggers - GP2X: Personal entertainment player (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GP2X) - Amstrad E3 Emailer - runs linux, some people have hacked it to make a VOIP station see: http://www.earth.li/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e3-hacking for details Will exchange for beer. Any takers? Cheers, Dave -- David Reynolds david(a)reynoldsfamily.org.uk

1 0

Merry Christmas All
by Simon Royal 25 Dec '10

25 Dec '10

Hi Merry Christmas Linux fans. Simon

1 0

Happy Newtonmas to all
by Steve Engledow 25 Dec '10

25 Dec '10

Morning, Just wanted to be the first (on-list) to wish ye all a merry/happy*: * Newtonmas * Christmas * Yule * Confusing day where you're wondering wtf everyone is partying and you're not Eat some apples :) Steve * (Delete as appropriate)

1 0

Scripting help: deleting old directories
by Mark Rogers 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Is there a simple way to locate directories which only contains files older than a certain date and then remove the directories? I can find old files easily enough, but if a directory has more than one file in it and one of the files is new, then I need to not touch the entire directory. It's only where all the files are old that I want it removed. -- Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450 Registered in England (0456 0902) @ 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG

3 5

Why Do You Use Linux?
by Simon Royal 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Hi As a Mac user for 10 years I often get asked 'why do you use a Mac', actually it is more in a mocking way than anything but it does make you think. When the rest of the computing world is happy to sit in the puddle of Microsoft there are others who strive for something better either via Mac or via Linux. I moved to Mac after years of slogging it with Windows partly because I started working in a design house but partly because I liked the Mac interface - which at the time was pre-OSX. A year or so later OSX came out and I have been through them all. I was also not impressed with the whole Windows experience. I bought a new machine and it was terrible, it didnt even run the OS it came with very well. I started an interest in Linux about 5 years ago - playing with Ubuntu and Vector to name a few but it wasnt until about 18 months ago that I thought about ditching the Mac and moving over full time. However, funds were very tight and I picked up a low end P2 which gave me a good experience of Linux - Ubuntu, Xubuntu, Mint, DSL, Puppy to name some - but the hardware was not up to being used as your main machine. I was also missing the Mac, so picked up an old G3 and that is where I am today. I never returned to the Mac with the one fanboying enthusiasm I had. Financially, I do not have a lot of money to spend on computers - my family has expanded in the last few years and funds are tight. Macs are not cheap, even older ones. I had a new Mac which died after only a few years and I have never climbed back again, scrappling with old G3 and G4 models. I did not want to go down the Microsoft route and with a fair amount of Linux knowledge under my belt decided to jump back into the non-Mac world, bought a ThinkPad (which I am still waiting to arrive) and that is where I am now. So in short, what make me a Linux user. Well, an ex-Mac user with a disgust for Microsoft and a fan of being different and a nerd at heart. So what make you lot a Linux? Why do you decide to walk on the other side of M? Simon -- --- Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal - LowEndMac: http://tinyurl.com/macspectrum - Skype: Simon-Royal. --- Apple PowerBook G3 'Pismo' running OS9/OSX 10.4/Ubuntu 10.10 - Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro running 2.1

14 36

Re: [ALUG] Why Do You Use Linux?
by Simon Royal 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Adam S60 is a great mobile OS. I used it for years until moving to Android. It might be old and clunky, but it is highly integrated and the contextual menus and fantastic. Simon ----- Original Message ----- From:Adam Bower To:main@lists.alug.org.uk Subject:Re: [ALUG] Why Do You Use Linux? On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:53:56AM +0000, Simon Elliott wrote: > Wayne, you can't attack Mick's figures then come out with something > ridiculous like S60 has "nothing like market share"...! Where'd you > get that from?! http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1466313 says > Symbian S60 devices hold the biggest chunk at 36.6% of smartphone > market share in Q3 2010.. (See table 2) It might be a different story > this time next year though. Only 20% of worldwide phone sales are smart phones too. Although, counting S60 as a smartphone OS is a bit rich imo ;) Adam -- New signature required, suggestions on a post card please. _______________________________________________ main(a)lists.alug.org.uk http://www.alug.org.uk/ http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!

2 1

Looking for simple[ish] drawing program for basic circuit diagrams
by Chris G 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

I want to put some simple circuit diagrams on web pages (or at least accessible from web pages) so I'm looking for a drawing program that is either easy to add circuit symbols to or has them already. I was going to use dia but whenever I try to actually use it I don't find it's as easy as it should be, I've Google'd a bit and found xcircuit which is quite a nice program but the mouse/keyboard usage is so non-standard it would take me ages to get used to it. Does anyone have any alternative suggestions or ideas? -- Chris Green

8 15

Re: [ALUG] Why Do You Use Linux?
by Simon Royal 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

James Great email and yes I did read it all. Linux is just about ready to jump in as a realistic competitor against Windows/Mac for the average user. I like Ubuntu 9 and 10 much better than 8. Im not a KDE fan, but I do like Lxde and some of the lighter ones like openbox. CrunchBang, Mint, Mint LXDE, WattOS, Xubuntu even Puppy are great for older machines. But I find in general Linux requires less heavy hardware than Windows so even a modest P3/P4 can run the latest gnome or kde based offerings. Each OS has its place and it is down to what you do on your machine, the environment you are in and the apps you require that defines your OS of choice, but with more and more things being done online and with developers writing more mainstream apps for Linux your OS is slowly becoming irrelevant. I for one am glad to be going down the steep learning curve of Linux and joining such a welcoming and helpful group again. Simon ----- Original Message ----- From:James Freer To:main@lists.alug.org.uk Subject:Re: [ALUG] Why Do You Use Linux? Good idea this post... be interesting to see where folk are coming from! as they say. 2007 i only had an old machine that could still just about run win98. I was given a couple of P3 1ghz. I was going to put win2k on one of them but after a browse in PC world in Ipswich i thought i'd give Ubuntu (ver 6.10 CD enclosed) a go. I had read about Red hat back in about 2000 but didn't get round to trying it. My father had just died and i found myself coping with my mother who was then diagnosed with Alzheimer's. While i was coping with her (a rather stressful disease to cope with to say the least) i tinkered with linux and read as much as i could. I could run all the applications i wanted to in linux apart from a mind mapping app, autocad, turbocad and a scanner. Most of the applications better than a doze equivalent although i'd used OO, Thunderbird and other common ones. But i also wanted to know more about linux. It seemed to me that unix in late 80s and early 90s didn't see the potential of the mini or home PC - microsoft jumped in there. What i liked was the cli - made almost redundant by microsoft and yet very much at the heart of the earlier windows. I have a liking for the simple but effective things in life - like my seven classic cars... there's nothing i can't do on them - can't do a lot on modern vehicles. On linux i enjoy the mix of graphical and cli. To me it's not either or - each have their place e.g. i like llgal (cli) for photo albums [http://jessejazza.110mb.com/photos/dogs/best-09/index.html] but i'll stay with graphical text editors. I got a better machine later and ran ubuntu 8.04 (tried the 9's and 10's and weren't to my liking), and have just bought my first new machine. I'm tinkering at present with what distro to use for a while as i've decided to move on from ubuntu. I'm also GOING TO do a Gentoo, slackware or LFS installation in the New Year - i've been promising to do this ever since i started using linux and still haven't got round to it. The linux 'MUST DO' they say 'then you'll know linux' - yet i've failed to get round to it so far. Perhaps it's worth a mention: what's the future of linux? Linux has certainly come into it's own for websites due to the security. Windows holds it's place in the market for office use and at home. Too many distros i feel give linux a bad name and a fair number produce more than the main three desktops. Yes; linux is about choice but i also wonder about the long term of too much choice. Ubuntu is produced in so many forms now and yet the project is still in the red... and that can't continue for much longer. Do i donate; yes to releases that don't have problems. The three distros i've tried where i feel they have gone the extra mile are Pclos, Mint and Mepis yet these are one-man-bands. But each distro i've tried i find there are things i like and then things i don't. Mepis (kde) ran nicely and faster than ubuntu on the P3 - Mepis gets first place for kde imo. Pclos have taken a step that i feel is significant for the future - 'mini' releases. [This Texstar fellow intrigues me... seems full of new ideas - e.g. in pclos before you can use synaptic (i think there the only rpm distro using APT) one runs a speed test and thus select the fastest download server (don't think anyone else does that)]. The basics are on the CD and you add your selection. With ubuntu i'd remove evolution and a lot of stuff i didn't like and put on Thunderbird and so on. So why don't distros save themselves development time and use mini versions for releases? Another development taking place it seems is the replacement for gnome. Gnome is hard to package (apparently) - slackware have dropped it and as other distros seem to be developing xfce maybe we'll be left with xfce and kde. xfce i gather sits on gnome partly and there's also standalone xfce on some distros. But then again certain distros seem to be keen to develop enlightenment, openbox, lxde - lighter versions for older machines! The majority of users probably have a dual core machine - perhaps the next generation of machines are going to be much more expensive! Currently computers are very cheap compared with what they were a decade ago. Quality certainly down - the motherboard on my old compaq P3 is vastly superior in my view. Bit like a landrover compared with a car - all rugged and reliable. Anyway rant over - got to ice the Christmas cake. james On 22 December 2010 14:59, Mark Rogers <mark(a)quarella.co.uk> wrote: > On 22/12/10 14:24, mick wrote: >> >> Don't get me wrong, I'm not naive enough to think that "linux is >> inherently more secure than windows", nor am I blind to the problems of >> application level exploits running in that universal firewall bypass we >> all love (i.e the browser, which to make things even worse may run >> flash). But I do like the fact that Linux in all its variants is a >> very, very, small and specialist target so malware developers leave it >> alone. > > I disagree with this. I agree that Linux isn't absolutely bullet proof, but > there are a number of reasons why Linux is better prepared for the threat > than Windows. The fact that anyone can audit the code really is a strength, > but also the fact (that you alluded to) that with Linux, most of the > software you want is an apt-get away, rather than downloaded from PirateBay > or similar. The package management also makes it a lot easier to keep things > up to date; Windows does a reasonable job these days of installing system > updates but you're very much on your own when it comes to application > updates, and the myriad of "update available, click here to install" > messages you get on Windows is a gift to trojan writers. > > Windows has improved from a position of real weakness (eg the Windows > equivalent of sudo), but it still suffers from things like driver > validation, which (because most aren't) requires that users get used to > clicking past the warnings. > > And the worst browser is still IE (at least with all the legacy versions out > there - and a lot of systems that cannot update past IE6), which although it > is way better now than it used to be has again started weak then got better, > rather than starting strong where most Linux applications have taken > security seriously for longer. Of-course it "helps" that the cost of a > Windows licence is substantially offset on most PCs by kickbacks from > security software trials, so the incentive isn't fully there to fix the > problem. Whilst the business model includes selling updates, it's "useful" > that old versions have problems that you have to pay to upgrade, and > upgrading between distro releases is way easier than between Windows > versions in any case. > > Linux distros would be wise not to be complacent (but I don't think they > generally are). Being a smaller target is part of why Linux is currently > safer but it really is not the whole story. A bigger concern would be a > major shift to closed-source drivers and applications on Linux (it's no > coincidence that Flash is one of the biggest problems right now). > > -- > Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0844 251 1450 > Registered in England (0456 0902) @ 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG > > > _______________________________________________ > main(a)lists.alug.org.uk > http://www.alug.org.uk/ > http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main > Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above! > _______________________________________________ main(a)lists.alug.org.uk http://www.alug.org.uk/ http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!

1 0

Mint 10
by Simon Royal 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi Has anyone tried the new 'Julia' version of Linux Mint. Its version 10. I used Linux Mint 9 LXDE a few months ago and it was amazing. Stable, gorgeous and very fast even on a P3 500mhz. Im thinking of putting 10 on my ThinkPad when it arrives. Simon

9 11