Hello Jonathan
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
jabber.earth.li runs fine here, but since 4-5days my ICQ-contacts were shown always offline after netsplit. I was online on buddies systems an chat runs normally. The transport is shown online, only problems with my contacts. I tried new connect for the transport, no results. Any tips?
I've restarted the transport - is that any better for you now?
J.
No... i've deleted the icq-transport and registered again, but nothing happens with my contacts. :(
Regards Rainer
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:34:00PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
jabber.earth.li runs fine here, but since 4-5days my ICQ-contacts were shown always offline after netsplit. I was online on buddies systems an chat runs normally. The transport is shown online, only problems with my contacts. I tried new connect for the transport, no results. Any tips?
I've restarted the transport - is that any better for you now?
No... i've deleted the icq-transport and registered again, but nothing happens with my contacts. :(
Then I've no idea; I can see my ICQ contacts ok. You /are/ using the ICQ-AIM transport, right?
J.
Hello Jonathan
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:34:00PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
jabber.earth.li runs fine here, but since 4-5days my ICQ-contacts were shown always offline after netsplit. I was online on buddies systems an chat runs normally. The transport is shown online, only problems with my contacts. I tried new connect for the transport, no results. Any tips?
I've restarted the transport - is that any better for you now?
No... i've deleted the icq-transport and registered again, but nothing happens with my contacts. :(
Then I've no idea; I can see my ICQ contacts ok. You /are/ using the ICQ-AIM transport, right?
J.
Yes. Only this ICQ-transport is available in the agents-list here.
Regards Rainer
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:34:00PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
jabber.earth.li runs fine here, but since 4-5days my ICQ-contacts were shown always offline after netsplit. I was online on buddies systems an chat runs normally. The transport is shown online, only problems with my contacts. I tried new connect for the transport, no results. Any tips?
I've restarted the transport - is that any better for you now?
No... i've deleted the icq-transport and registered again, but nothing happens with my contacts. :(
Then I've no idea; I can see my ICQ contacts ok. You /are/ using the ICQ-AIM transport, right?
J.
Hi, i'm not alone with "my" problem. Other buddys have the same behavior and that with other servers! The checkes servers are: jabbernet.dk, gabbler.de, carrott.org and syndicon.de.
Regards Rainer
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:18:30PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:34:00PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
On 22.11.2007, you wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:39PM +0100, TomcatOne wrote:
jabber.earth.li runs fine here, but since 4-5days my ICQ-contacts were shown always offline after netsplit. I was online on buddies systems an chat runs normally. The transport is shown online, only problems with my contacts. I tried new connect for the transport, no results. Any tips?
I've restarted the transport - is that any better for you now?
No... i've deleted the icq-transport and registered again, but nothing happens with my contacts. :(
Then I've no idea; I can see my ICQ contacts ok. You /are/ using the ICQ-AIM transport, right?
Hi, i'm not alone with "my" problem. Other buddys have the same behavior and that with other servers! The checkes servers are: jabbernet.dk, gabbler.de, carrott.org and syndicon.de.
That would imply it's an ICQ issue/protocol change then, rather than a local problem. I've installed PyAIMt (instead of the aging icq-aim-transport) in the offchance that might help, but I don't think it has. Is it any better/worse for you?
J.