According to my Thames map, 'Built in 1898, Shifford Lock is the youngest on the Thames. It is located at the eastern end of a tree-lined artificial cut which by-passes the loop of the river with its many tight meanders, now a peaceful backwater, near Duxford. Part of the back-water remains navigable by small craft to Duxford ford, the only surviving purpose-built ford on the river.' However, I have walked along it from Duxford ford to the lock, and there are a number of trees fallen into the water, so I concluded swimming it would not be a good idea. See you next week. I can only do Sunday. At this rate I'm going to have to do a lot of catching up swims, However, I am really enjoying those bits I'm able to do. Mary .
--- On Sat, 20/8/11, Colin Palmer colin.palmer@talktalk.net wrote:
From: Colin Palmer colin.palmer@talktalk.net Subject: Re: [OSS Oxon] Cheating Thames swimmers To: "'Pam Jones'" pamjones@btinternet.com, ossoxon@earth.li Date: Saturday, 20 August, 2011, 14:15
yes
From: ossoxon-bounces@earth.li [mailto:ossoxon-bounces@earth.li] On Behalf Of Pam Jones Sent: 20 August 2011 14:10 To: ossoxon@earth.li Subject: [OSS Oxon] Cheating Thames swimmers I have been examining the map of the Thames minutely and have realised that, by going left to Shifford Lock at the end of Swim 9 where it usefully signposted Lock, we actually cut off a huge loop of the Thames proper. Do we really allow little things like avoiding weirs to excuse such morally questionable behaviour? Pam x -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________ OSS Oxon mailing list OSSOxon@earth.li http://www.earth.li/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ossoxon
Please note that OSS Oxon exists to put swimmers in touch with other swimmers, not to organise swim events or in any way suggest that outdoor swimming is a safe activity or that you should go swimming. If you choose to swim you do so entirely at your own risk and on your own initiative, and any plans you make are your own responsibility.