Sisela February 2004

sisela@earth.li

7 participants
8 discussions

installing c++ application in sisela
by sunil Arora 01 Mar '04

01 Mar '04

Hi all, I am quite new to sisela but quite impressed by it. I have to install a custom kernel in sisela and then want to install a user level application which is built in c++. I am over with installation of the kernel. that was quite simple but now the application need stdc++ library support and can not be compiled by the uclibc0.9.20 tool chain (there is no g++ wrapper) which is in present sisela. I found out that i will need to compile that application with tool-chain supplied by uclibc ppl. i have installed buildroot development platform and can compile new application. Now i need to INSTALL THE SHARED LIBRARIES THIS APPLICATION NEEDS IN THE REQUIRED STRIPPED MINIMUM FORMAT as other libraries in sisela. I have no clue regarding this.. can anybudy help me here?? thanx in advance.. -sunil __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

2 1

Sisela and IP Masquerading
by s0233421 16 Feb '04

16 Feb '04

I dunno if these questions have been asked before or if there's something I'm just doing wrong, but for some reason I have a problem Sisela installs quite nicely, gets an IP and sets up routing without too much bother, and as far as I can see everything works, i.e. sisela can ping www.google.com , sisela can ping another box attached to it (172.24.12.34) and that box can ping sisela. Everything works fine. At this point I try setting up IP Masquerading/IP Forwading with the following echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -i eth1 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -s 172.24.0.0/16 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE However upon trying to ping www.google.com on 172.24.12.34, nothing happens. This is quite odd, since I've used the same code (with stuff like logging and some basic port-filtering) on both slackware and debian installations and its worked more or less perfectly. have I assumed something sisela needs to be told explicity, or is there another way of doing this or something ? Sorry if this is incredibly trivial and a waste of time, but I'm somewhat perplexed. Oh and can the 0.3a code be compiled from the 0.3 ? I'd like sisela to boot with "pcifix" automatically and have a feeling I'll have to compile it into the code. Thanks for your help, and thanks for what is otherwise a very cool disc :) Mark

3 11

Packet loss
by Andre Ribeiro 16 Feb '04

16 Feb '04

Hello, i'm getting packet loss in an wireless circuit because I need pass trought some trees, and, to try minimize the symptoms I thinked to make an TCP tunnel between the sisela servers. Do you realize if it will work ? thanks, André.

2 1

IPv6 PIM-SM support
by Manrique Arias 13 Feb '04

13 Feb '04

Hi every one. I want to ask if the latest version of sisela suppports PIM-SM for IPv6. I now there is a running version for BSD but I need it to be Linux, as part of a mobility project. Is this possible with sisela? If not, I would also appreciate tips or suggestions where I could find something. Thanks in advance. Manrique

2 1

Re: [sisela] Spamvertising on list
by ilox 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

<<Thanks for your mail though, since I didn't actually see the message in question - it was caught by my own filters...>> The silver lining we sometimes get when we least expect it <G> Glad to have helped (I think) :) Cheers, Ian ---------------- Powered by telstra.com

1 0

Re: [sisela] Spamvertising on list
by ilox 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

To the list owner. I always manage my lists in paranoid mode. Every newcomer must post at least one message under Moderation before they are able to post direct to the list. I don't trust Spam detection especially with the new breeds of spammers creating all sorts of weird and wonderful combinations to try to slip past detector algorithms. It's up to you but I certainly don't want to see advertinsing appearing amidst the informative posts that are the norm for this list... Cheers, Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: Morton Stringer <ppwsc6(a)BIRMINGHAMFANS.com> Date: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:00 pm Subject: [sisela] Huge sale for OEM Windows, Office, Adobe - under $99 per CDs abed ---------------- Powered by telstra.com

2 1

Re: [sisela] Extending sisela
by Justin J.Hayes 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

At Friday, 30 January 2004, you wrote: >But I would suggest multiple floppies make more sense to >me. I think half the point of sisela was that you don't have to change disks. For a war driving situation I guess that's not too bad since you're in front of the machine, but as a remote router on some wide area network, it's not always convenient to get to the location of the sisela box. Just a thought. =================================================================== EASY and FREE access to your email anywhere: http://Mailreader.com/ ===================================================================

3 2

Re: Re: [sisela] Extending sisela
by MixMatch 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

I think the idea of putting it on other floppies is that it would make it a completely optional addition; something that would be unnecessary for servers, and anything not doing so called wardriving... course, I see no reason to not include everything in the cd, and just make a configuration option to disable it all. ---- On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Martin Ling (martin-sisela(a)earth.li) wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:32:03AM +0000, Justin J. Hayes wrote: > > > > At Friday, 30 January 2004, you wrote: > > > > >But I would suggest multiple floppies make more sense to > > >me. > > > > I think half the point of sisela was that you don't have to change > > disks. For a war driving situation I guess that's not too bad since > > you're in front of the machine, but as a remote router on some wide > > area network, it's not always convenient to get to the location of > > the sisela box. > > Plus of course you want things to come back up if the power goes out, > and be able to remotely reboot if the system gets in any kind of real > mess. I should look into adding the Linux software watchdog, in fact. > > Is there some particular reason people want a wardriving kit on a > floppy by the way, or is it just "kewl"? It's okay, I'll still try if > you want it, I'm just wondering... ;-) > > > Martin > > -- > http://the.earth.li/~martin/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sisela mailing list > Sisela(a)earth.li > http://www.earth.li/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sisela > >

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Sisela February 2004