18 Dec
2007
18 Dec
'07
11:44 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:10:12AM +0000, samwise wrote:
Ah, Geany looks like it's worth a whirl ...
Si, is nano++ different to nano? Can't find any mention of a ++ version after a quick google ...
Rather than meaning "nano"++, he was indicating a vote for the use of nano ;)
--
Brett Parker