(TL;DR: I’ve been trying out btrfs in some places instead of ext4, I’ve hit absolutely zero issues and there are a few features that make me plan to use it more.)
Despite (or perhaps because of) working on storage products for a reasonable chunk of my career I have tended towards a conservative approach to my filesystems. By the time I came to Linux ext2 was well established, the move to ext3 was a logical one (the joys of added journalling for faster recovery after unclean shutdowns) and for a long time my default stack has been MD raid with LVM2 on top and then ext4 as the filesystem.
I’ve dabbled with other filesystems; I ran XFS for a while on my VDR machine, and also when I had a large tradspool with INN, but never really had a hard requirement for it. I’ve ended up adminning a machine that had JFS in the past, largely for historical reasons, but don’t really remember any issues (vague recollections of NFS problems but that might just have been NFS being NFS).
However. ZFS has gathered itself a significant fan base and that makes me wonder about what it can offer and whether I want that. Firstly, let’s be clear that I’m never going to run a primary filesystem that isn’t part of the mainline kernel. So ZFS itself is out, because I run Linux. So what do I want that I can’t get with ext4? Firstly, I’d like data checksumming. As storage gets larger there’s a bigger chance of silent data corruption and while I have backups of the important stuff that doesn’t help if you don’t know you need to use them. Secondly, these days I have machines running containers, VMs, or with lots of source checkouts with a reasonable amount of overlap in their data. Disk space has got cheaper, but I’d still like to be able to do some sort of deduplication of common blocks.
So, I’ve been trying out btrfs. When I installed my desktop I went with btrfs for
/home (I kept
/boot as ext4). The thought process was that this was a local machine (so easy access if it all went wrong) and I take regular backups (so if it all went wrong I could recover). That was a year and a half ago and it’s been pretty dull; I mostly forget I’m running btrfs instead of ext4. This is on a machine that tracks Debian testing, so currently on kernel 6.1 but originally installed with 5.10. So it seems modern btrfs is reasonably stable for a machine that isn’t driven especially hard. Good start.
The fact I forget what filesystem I’m running points to the fact that I’m not actually doing anything special here. I get the advantage of data checksumming, but not much else. 2 things spring to mind. Firstly, I don’t do snapshots. Given I run testing it might be wiser if I did take a snapshot before every
apt-get upgrade, and I have a friend who does just that, but even when I’ve run unstable I’ve never had a machine get itself into a state that I couldn’t recover so I haven’t spent time investigating. I note Ubuntu has apt-btrfs-snapshot but it doesn’t seem to have any updates for years.
The other thing I didn’t do when I installed my desktop is take advantage of subvolumes. I’m still trying to get my head around exactly what I want them for, but they provide a partial replacement for LVM when it comes to carving up disk space. Instead of the separate
/home LVs I created I could have created a single LV that would have a single btrfs filesystem on it.
/home would then be separate subvolumes, allowing me to snapshot each individually. Quotas can also be applied separately so there’s still the potential to prevent one subvolume taking all available space.
Encouraged by the lack of hassle with my desktop I decided to try moving my sbuild machine over to use btrfs for its build chroots. For Reasons this is a VM kindly hosted by a friend, rather than something local. To be honest these days I would probably go for local hosting, but it works and there’s no strong reason to move. The point is it’s remote, and so if migrating went wrong and I had to ask for assistance I’d be bothering someone who’s doing me a favour as it is.
The build VM is, of course, running LVM, and there was luckily some free space available. I’m reasonably sure the underlying storage involves spinning rust, so I did a laborious set of
pvmove commands to make sure all the available space was at the start of the PV, and created a new btrfs volume there. I was advised that while btrfs-convert would do the job it was better to create a fresh filesystem where possible. This time I did create an initial
Configuring up sbuild was then much simpler than I’d expected. My setup originally started out as a set of tarballs for the chroots that would get untarred + used for the builds, which is pretty slow. Once overlayfs was mature enough I switched to that. I’d had a conversation with Enrico about his nspawn/btrfs setup, but it turned out Russ Allbery had written an excellent set of instructions on sbuild with btrfs. I tweaked my existing setup based on his details, and I was in business. Each chroot is a separate subvolume - I don’t actually end up having to mount them individually, but it means that only the chroot in use gets snapshotted. For example during a build the following can be observed:
# btrfs subvolume list /
ID 257 gen 111534 top level 5 path root
ID 271 gen 111525 top level 257 path srv/chroot/unstable-amd64-sbuild
ID 275 gen 27873 top level 257 path srv/chroot/bullseye-amd64-sbuild
ID 276 gen 27873 top level 257 path srv/chroot/buster-amd64-sbuild
ID 343 gen 111533 top level 257 path srv/chroot/snapshots/unstable-amd64-sbuild-328059a0-e74b-4d9f-be70-24b59ccba121
I was a little confused about whether I’d got something wrong because the snapshot top level is listed as
257 rather than
271, but digging further with
btrfs subvolume show on the 2 mounted directories correctly showed the snapshot had a parent equal to the chroot, not
As a final step I ran jdupes via
jdupes -1Br / to deduplicate things across the filesystem. It didn’t end up providing a significant saving unfortunately - I guess there’s a reasonable amount of change between Debian releases - but I think tried it on my desktop, which tends to have a large number of similar source trees checked out. There I managed to save about 5% on
/home, which didn’t seem too shabby.
The sbuild setup has been in place for a couple of months now, and I’ve run quite a few builds on it while preparing for the freeze. So I’m fairly confident in the stability of the setup and my next move is to transition my local house server over to btrfs for its containers (which all run under
systemd-nspawn). Those are generally running a Debian stable base so there should be a decent amount of commonality for deduping.
I’m not saying I’m yet at the point where I’ll default to btrfs on new installs, but I’m definitely looking at it for situations where I think I can get benefits from deduplication, or being able to divide up disk space without hard partitioning space.
(And, just to answer the worry I had when I started, I’ve got nowhere near
ENOSPC problems, but I believe they’re handled much more gracefully these days. And my experience of ZFS when it got above 90% utilization was far from ideal too.)