Re: e3-hacking Digest, Vol 17, Issue 3
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:52:22PM -0400, yragretsil@aol.com wrote:
REMOVE ME PRICK
Gee, thanks. You do wonders for the perception of AOL users as idiots. (I've removed he/she/it given their inability to follow the simple instructions I posted earlier in the week. Is anyone else in similar position?) J. -- [ The less time planning, the more time programming. ]
STOP sending me these emails (I need to know what I don`t know)
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li> Reply-To: Discussion of the Amstrad E3 emailer hardware/software<e3-hacking@earth.li> To: e3-hacking@earth.li Subject: Re: [E3-hacking] Removing people who don't want to be here Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:00:04 +0100
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:52:22PM -0400, yragretsil@aol.com wrote:
REMOVE ME PRICK
Gee, thanks. You do wonders for the perception of AOL users as idiots.
(I've removed he/she/it given their inability to follow the simple instructions I posted earlier in the week. Is anyone else in similar position?)
J.
-- [ The less time planning, the more time programming. ]
_______________________________________________ e3-hacking mailing list e3-hacking@earth.li http://www.earth.li/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e3-hacking
On 4 Oct 2006, at 23:05, Piotr Michniewski wrote:
2006/10/4, Brian V <cul8rm8@hotmail.com>:
STOP sending me these emails
Umm... Then why did you sign up in the first place ?
Probably because he wants to unlock his E3. *sigh* People. Can't live with them, can't shoot them. -J.
2006/10/5, Jasmine Strong <jasmine@electronpusher.org>:
Probably because he wants to unlock his E3.
Maybe Jonathan should add "We WILL NOT discuss about UNLOCKING your E3, so get lost" to the mailing list description ?
*sigh* People. Can't live with them, can't shoot them.
Oh, so true... -- Piotr Michniewski
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:04:09AM +0200, Piotr Michniewski wrote:
2006/10/5, Jasmine Strong <jasmine@electronpusher.org>:
Probably because he wants to unlock his E3.
Maybe Jonathan should add "We WILL NOT discuss about UNLOCKING your E3, so get lost" to the mailing list description ?
I've already had to add something similar to my webpage about the E3 as I was getting numerous requests from people for this. I've added a line to the list description indicating such discussion is off topic. J. -- 9 out of 10 men who tried Camels prefer women.
Maybe Jonathan should add "We WILL NOT discuss about UNLOCKING your E3, so get lost" to the mailing list description ?
I've already had to add something similar to my webpage about the E3 as I was getting numerous requests from people for this. I've added a line to the list description indicating such discussion is off topic.
LOL all fair enough, but I do wish it wasn't off topic ;) What gets me is the unsub instructions are in the HEADERS!! FFS!!!
Maybe Jonathan should add "We WILL NOT discuss about UNLOCKING your E3, so get lost" to the mailing list description ?
I've already had to add something similar to my webpage about the E3 as I was getting numerous requests from people for this. I've added a line to the list description indicating such discussion is off topic.
LOL all fair enough, but I do wish it wasn't off topic ;)
What gets me is the unsub instructions are in the HEADERS!! FFS!!!
errr... as in they're pretty easy to see for the pillocks who want off, not the other way around. (must remember to proof read all posts!!)
On 10/5/06, James Tinmouth <james-amstrad@emailblock.co.uk> wrote:
What gets me is the unsub instructions are in the HEADERS!! FFS!!!
errr... as in they're pretty easy to see for the pillocks who want off, not the other way around. (must remember to proof read all posts!!)
No no! Surely you meant your first, rational, sensible way round? This second way of putting it makes no sense. Why would sig info be in the headers? Who looks there?
What gets me is the unsub instructions are in the HEADERS!! FFS!!!
errr... as in they're pretty easy to see for the pillocks who want off, not the other way around. (must remember to proof read all posts!!)
No no! Surely you meant your first, rational, sensible way round? This second way of putting it makes no sense. Why would sig info be in the headers? Who looks there?
Nee sorry I did mean that in the headers makes sense. I didn't really say it the wrong way around, just wasn't clear what I was FFSing at ;) I thought it was common that conventional mailing lists have the unsub details in the header. Maybe it's cos I've got a mail reader that understands them and gives a link to unsub on every mail. TBH anyone who says "REMOVE ME PRICK" would probably not read the unsub details even if they were in bazillion point bold at the top of every post anyway;) Cheers James
On 10/5/06, James Tinmouth <james-amstrad@emailblock.co.uk> wrote:
Maybe Jonathan should add "We WILL NOT discuss about UNLOCKING your E3, so get lost" to the mailing list description ?
I've already had to add something similar to my webpage about the E3 as I was getting numerous requests from people for this. I've added a line to the list description indicating such discussion is off topic.
LOL all fair enough, but I do wish it wasn't off topic ;)
Me too - I reckon a large proportion of those that are here, came looking for hacks and stuff. I stay out of interest - I wish someone would link to the info I guess many of us are after. Interstingly, the list page says: "e3-hacking: Discussion on using the emailer as Amstrad intended." :) :)
What gets me is the unsub instructions are in the HEADERS!! FFS!!!
Yeah, I have to agree there - I'd never think of looking in the headers, and I bet a lot of people don't even know they exist. I think the words "unsubscribe info" added at the footer before the link, might save some time!
participants (7)
-
Brian V -
James Tinmouth -
Jasmine Strong -
Jonathan H -
Jonathan McDowell -
Piotr Michniewski -
yragretsil＠aol.com