16 May
2006
16 May
'06
10:19 a.m.
On 16 May 2006, at 12:12, Cliff Lawson wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jasmine Strong [mailto:jasmine@electronpusher.org]
Because 2.4 is obsolete and basing new projects on it is a very bad idea.
Methinks you missed the point.
Um, no, I didn't. The point David was making was orthogonal to the one you were making.
The reason we have not successfully booted 2.6 from PBL is that for some reason DEBUG_MUTEXES breaks 2.6 booting from PBL NAND (but not from a serial load). Therefore, to boot from PBL to date we have needed to use 2.4, which is obsolete and therefore not cool.
-J.