[cgi-wiki-dev] Re: [OGDev] Re: [OpenGuides-Dev] Release, bugs, and Search::InvertedIndex support?

Dominic Hargreaves dom at earth.li
Mon Nov 21 16:04:58 GMT 2005

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:39:19AM -0500, IvorW wrote:

> I think it's worth retaining the pluggability of searches, so that we could add alternative(s) to Plucene at some future stage. I had a problem with installing Plucene on one machine, and fell back to SII, but since resolved the problem with Plucene. 


> IMHO, it's nice to have an alternative to Plucene so that we can check it for anomalies in the search results, even though it's inferior.
> By the way, any news on the proken compatibility with the latest Text::WikiFormat? I needed to dive into backpan to retrieve an old T::WF that worked with CGI::Wiki.

This shouldn't be needed in the latest release. It was fixed in:

It should probably be caught in CGI::Wiki too, but at the moment at
least I don't have any direct involvement in the development of that.



Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)

More information about the CGI-Wiki-dev mailing list