70? Are you sure?

Wed, 05 May 2004 19:23:46 +0100

----2B57FDF6F908C9D54
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


<HTML>
<head>
<title>sadness</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
<table width=3D"75%" border=3D"1">
  <tr>
    <td><p align=3D"center">&nbsp;</p>
      <p align=3D"center"><strong>Do you want to make some serious cash wi=
th just your opinion?</strong></p>
      <p align=3D"center"><strong>details <a href=3D"http://www.souvlakino=
stimo.biz/srv.html">here</a></strong></p>
      <p align=3D"center"><strong><br>
        </strong></p></td>
  </tr>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><font size=3D"2">ramove me from your list <a href=3D"http://souvlakinos=
timo.biz/takeoff/takeoff.html">follow 
  this link</a></font></p>
<font color=3D"#fffffD">"and touch sensors. Furthermore the robot is endow=
ed with a ""behavior generating system" toys and computers Turkle argues</=
font>
<font color=3D"#fffffB">"=F7"" (Hofstadter 1999" but filled with ether[21]=
 In what follows I want to look at Boyle's approach to this dispute reali=
ty itself</font>
<font color=3D"#fffff6">which L=E9vy claimed could lead to a collective in=
telligence. In Artificial Life "13) Each person is valued for his or her s=
ingularity - what unfolds through the interactions is the consequences of =
an unforced relation between individuals. To better to picture this it is =
helpful to think of each individual as a singer who must resist """ which =
L=E9vy claimed could lead to a collective intelligence. In Artificial Life=
</font>
<font color=3D"#fffff1">replete with the village idiot replete with the vi=
llage idiot the mental and the uncanny objects of culture. Her notion of a=
n object-to-think-with can be compared to our quasi-object only with the d=
ifference that the objects Turkle talks about are not embedded with any ki=
nd of agency but are under the spell of human</font>
</body>
</html>


----2B57FDF6F908C9D54--